Frank F. Matthews
Usenet User
Registered: Not Yet
Location:
Posts: N/A |
Re: Message trimming
bill frogg wrote:
> On 2005-03-03 11:18:38 -0800, Padraig Breathnach <padraigb@MUNGEDiol.ie>
> said:
>
>> "Frank F. Matthews" <frankfmatthews@houston.rr.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> chancellor of the duchy of besses o' th' barn wrote:
>>>
>>>> Padraig Breathnach <padraigb@MUNGEDiol.ie> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> this_address_is_for_spam@yahoo.com (chancellor of the duchy of besses
>>>>> o' th' barn) wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Frank F. Matthews <frankfmatthews@houston.rr.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Shall we start another diversion to top posting where the
>>>>>>> trimming is
>>>>>>> easier.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, because most sensible, responsible Usenet posters have already
>>>>>> made
>>>>>> a clear decision as to the issue of top posting.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Are you talking about us?
>>>>> Really?
>>>>>
>>>>> Sensible and responsible? Us? US?
>>>>>
>>>>> Nah. You're being ironic, arentcha?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'm talking about the way "we" post, not what we post about!
>>>>
>>> It does, however, lead many posters into perdition as they manage to
>>> muck up the links between attributions and the material when they do
>>> deletions. It may be viewed as responsible but it certainly isn't
>>> sensible although it is common.
>>>
>> You're trolling.
>
> Top posting is a "gay thing" isn't it ? bill
>
Nah! It's really a Nazi thing but we won't tell folks.
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|