AboutMy* Talk Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences Registration is free! Find other members Frequently Asked Questions Search Home  
AboutMy* Talk : Powered by vBulletin version 2.3.2 AboutMy* Talk > Other Interesting Newsgroups > Political Activism (misc.activism.progressive) > Are We Stingy? Yes
  Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Click Here for True Honest Job Stories from AboutMyJob.com
Thread Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Michael Givel
Usenet User

Registered: Not Yet
Location:
Posts: N/A

Are We Stingy? Yes

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/30/o...ef=login&th

NY Times EDITORIAL

Are We Stingy? Yes

Published: December 30, 2004


President Bush finally roused himself yesterday from his vacation in
Crawford, Tex., to telephone his sympathy to the leaders of India, Sri
Lanka, Thailand and Indonesia, and to speak publicly about the
devastation of Sunday's tsunamis in Asia. He also hurried to put as
much distance as possible between himself and America's initial measly
aid offer of $15 million, and he took issue with an earlier statement
by the United Nations' emergency relief coordinator, Jan Egeland, who
had called the overall aid efforts by rich Western nations "stingy."
"The person who made that statement was very misguided and ill
informed," the president said.

We beg to differ. Mr. Egeland was right on target. We hope Secretary of
State Colin Powell was privately embarrassed when, two days into a
catastrophic disaster that hit 12 of the world's poorer countries and
will cost billions of dollars to meliorate, he held a press conference
to say that America, the world's richest nation, would contribute $15
million. That's less than half of what Republicans plan to spend on the
Bush inaugural festivities.

The American aid figure for the current disaster is now $35 million,
and we applaud Mr. Bush's turnaround. But $35 million remains a miserly
drop in the bucket, and is in keeping with the pitiful amount of the
United States budget that we allocate for nonmilitary foreign aid.
According to a poll, most Americans believe the United States spends 24
percent of its budget on aid to poor countries; it actually spends well
under a quarter of 1 percent.

Bush administration officials help create that perception gap. Fuming
at the charge of stinginess, Mr. Powell pointed to disaster relief and
said the United States "has given more aid in the last four years than
any other nation or combination of nations in the world." But for
development aid, America gave $16.2 billion in 2003; the European Union
gave $37.1 billion. In 2002, those numbers were $13.2 billion for
America, and $29.9 billion for Europe.

Making things worse, we often pledge more money than we actually
deliver. Victims of the earthquake in Bam, Iran, a year ago are still
living in tents because aid, including ours, has not materialized in
the amounts pledged. And back in 2002, Mr. Bush announced his
Millennium Challenge account to give African countries development
assistance of up to $5 billion a year, but the account has yet to
disperse a single dollar.

Mr. Bush said yesterday that the $35 million we've now pledged "is only
the beginning" of the United States' recovery effort. Let's hope that
is true, and that this time, our actions will match our promises.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 12-30-2004 08:02 PM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:37 PM. Post New Thread    Post A Reply
  Last Thread   Next Thread
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread

Rate This Thread:

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is OFF
 

< Contact Us - AboutMyTalk.com - Discussion forums for aboutmy* sites >

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.