AboutMy* Talk Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences Registration is free! Find other members Frequently Asked Questions Search Home  
AboutMy* Talk : Powered by vBulletin version 2.3.2 AboutMy* Talk > Other Interesting Newsgroups > Political Activism (misc.activism.progressive) > Are We Stingy? Yes
  Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Click Here for True Honest Job Stories from AboutMyJob.com
Thread Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Mark Graffis
Usenet User

Registered: Not Yet
Location:
Posts: N/A

Are We Stingy? Yes

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/30/o...ef=login&hp

December 30, 2004
EDITORIAL
Are We Stingy? Yes

President Bush finally roused himself yesterday from his vacation in
Crawford, Tex., to telephone his sympathy to the leaders of India, Sri
Lanka, Thailand and Indonesia, and to speak publicly about the devastation
of Sunday's tsunamis in Asia. He also hurried to put as much distance as
possible between himself and America's initial measly aid offer of $15
million, and he took issue with an earlier statement by the United Nations'
emergency relief coordinator, Jan Egeland, who had called the overall aid
efforts by rich Western nations "stingy." "The person who made that
statement was very misguided and ill informed," the president said.
We beg to differ. Mr. Egeland was right on target. We hope Secretary of
State Colin Powell was privately embarrassed when, two days into a
catastrophic disaster that hit 12 of the world's poorer countries and will
cost billions of dollars to meliorate, he held a press conference to say
that America, the world's richest nation, would contribute $15 million.
That's less than half of what Republicans plan to spend on the Bush
inaugural festivities.
The American aid figure for the current disaster is now $35 million, and we
applaud Mr. Bush's turnaround. But $35 million remains a miserly drop in the
bucket, and is in keeping with the pitiful amount of the United States
budget that we allocate for nonmilitary foreign aid. According to a poll,
most Americans believe the United States spends 24 percent of its budget on
aid to poor countries; it actually spends well under a quarter of 1 percent.
Bush administration officials help create that perception gap. Fuming at the
charge of stinginess, Mr. Powell pointed to disaster relief and said the
United States "has given more aid in the last four years than any other
nation or combination of nations in the world." But for development aid,
America gave $16.2 billion in 2003; the European Union gave $37.1 billion.
In 2002, those numbers were $13.2 billion for America, and $29.9 billion for
Europe.
Making things worse, we often pledge more money than we actually deliver.
Victims of the earthquake in Bam, Iran, a year ago are still living in tents
because aid, including ours, has not materialized in the amounts pledged.
And back in 2002, Mr. Bush announced his Millennium Challenge account to
give African countries development assistance of up to $5 billion a year,
but the account has yet to disperse a single dollar.
Mr. Bush said yesterday that the $35 million we've now pledged "is only the
beginning" of the United States' recovery effort. Let's hope that is true,
and that this time, our actions will match our promises.

Copyright 2004 The New York Times Company

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 12-30-2004 03:06 PM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:18 PM. Post New Thread    Post A Reply
  Last Thread   Next Thread
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread

Rate This Thread:

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is OFF
 

< Contact Us - AboutMyTalk.com - Discussion forums for aboutmy* sites >

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.